![samsung portable ssd t7 2tb samsung portable ssd t7 2tb](https://yourtechspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/81KS7dK9ByL._AC_SL1500_.jpg)
Samsung portable ssd t7 2tb password#
Indeed, what Samsung has done with the T7 Touch is raising the baseline for securing your data on the move by adding biometrics to password protection expect others to follow suit swiftly both on external SSD and flash drives as well. Yes, it doesn’t do IP68 and doesn’t have any of the security certifications most of its more expensive rivals have, but at this price point, nobody really cares. The T7 Touch can’t be touched (pun intended) when it comes to procuring the right balance between security, speed, portability and pricing. Military MIL-STD-810G 516.6 standard but is far slower than the T7. It is waterproof, shockproof and costs only $102 for the 960GB version. If you don’t care about either and just want an external solid state drive, then the ADATA SD600Q should be high on your list. At just under $167 at Amazon, it is far, far cheaper than the T7 Touch, although the price difference with the T7 is likely to be much smaller. It is a bit slower but retains the same form factor and design. If the Samsung brand is compulsory, then the T5 is the obvious choice if you can live without the fingerprint reader.
![samsung portable ssd t7 2tb samsung portable ssd t7 2tb](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0HxGo7wyNf8/maxresdefault.jpg)
On the other hand, it is FIPS 140-2 Level 2 Validated and comes with a number of security features that the T7 Touch doesn’t offer. It is also far bigger and is much slower. The 1TB Fortress SSD from the former costs nearly twice the price of the equivalent T7 Touch. Instead, secure storage specialists like Apricorn Aegis or Datashur, will use a numeric keypad. If a military-grade security is an absolute must, then you won’t find a fingerprint reader anywhere. touch at this price point but then again, where it misses out on a knockout is that it doesn’t offer any IP68/MIL-STD-810G rating. If you want a device that offers seamless encryption, then the T7 Touch is hard to …. In real life we measured 1032 and 924MBps on CrystalDiskMark which is not that far from Samsung’s own readings The competition Samsung claims that the drive can achieve read/write speeds of up to 1.05GBps, which it says, is about twice what the T5 could reach. It can be a bit of an issue should you have to move the drive around. Note that the device needs to be connected at all times for the fingerprint reader to work. Bear in mind that results will vary based on the workload and ambient air temperature.Here’s how the Samsung T7 Touch performed in our benchmark tests:ĬrystalDiskMark: 1032MBps (read) 924MBps (write)Ītto: 985MBps (read, 256mb) 897MBps (write, 256mb)ĪS SSD: 849MBps (seq read) 781MBps (seq write) data to see when (or if) thermal throttling kicks in and how it impacts performance. When possible, we also log the temperature of the drive via the S.M.A.R.T. We also monitor cache recovery via multiple idle rounds. This test reveals if the drive has a pseudo-SLC cache, which is a small portion of faster-programmed flash that absorbs incoming write workloads.
Samsung portable ssd t7 2tb full#
We threw in this one last test to measure the performance of the drive over a 15-minute window, writing to the full span of the drive. Write speed and temperature are two important and inter-related metrics for external devices. Sustained Write Performance, Cache Recovery, and Temperature Due to its NVMe interface, we would have expected it to outperform the SanDisk Extreme at least, but at a QD of 1, access times are roughly 0.3/0.1 ms read/write, which is not only higher than the 1TB Touch model but higher and worse than all other SSDs compared. At higher QDs than 1, the 2TB Samsung T7 hit peak performance figures of 976/848 MBps under sequential loads.ĭue to the DRAMless architecture, Samsung T7’s random performance trails the competition, too. It lags behind all the other 10 Gbps competition, slowly ramping up in performance to just under 1,000/800 MBps read/write. In ATTO, read and write performance lag at a QD of 1, which represents most real-world transfers in consumer use cases.